Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Class on the Arthurian Legend

     The Arthurian legend has always intrigued me. I've even begun writing my own adaption. If ever given the chance to teach a class on the Arthurian legend I’d be the first one in line for the spot. Technology could even be integrated with ease because digital re-telling(s) and other interpretations of the legend can only be accessed through the internet. There are several famous works on the Arthurian legend and just as many mediums. The Wikipedia page for works based on the legend is quite lengthy.

     To show just a small sample of how varied the legends are, something as simple as the name of a main character has changed from retelling to retelling. Morgan, Morgaine, and my personal preference, Morgana, have all been used in reference to the evil Witch of Camelot.
 
    It would not be a stretch to conclude that, as far as English is concerned, my dream class, that is to say the class I would most want to teach, would be one on the Arthurian legend. It is a goal of mine to someday make this become a reality. I would have fun, probably a little too much, designing a class that I would have wanted to take in High School.

I will leave my readers with a question: If you could teach your dream class, what would it be?

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Education debate

     This post is actually inspired by another education class I am enrolled in. Some background so as to understand the premise might be appreciated. I submitted a piece of writing to the professor detailing what was gained from listening to class presentations. In it I mentioned that I was glad to see some controversial topics being discussed. At the end I noted that America debates things it need not to and that that real debates are demanded by the circumstances but are not happening.

    The professor commented that the class wasn’t one on debate, but rather an overview of the American education system. She then invited me to discuss with her such topics that I might feel need debate. I intend to fully accept such an invitation, it is not often professors seek student comments on how the class might be conducted; more importantly I realized that there had been a misundertanding.

     I raise that debate comment at every chance I get because I am trying to spread awareness of how much time is being blown on discussing pointless topics and getting nowhere fast in solving America’s problems.

     A large portion of the problems that are facing the American education system today are because America has been riding the post-World War II (WWII) coattails for much too long.  Allow me to elaborate, America after WWII was undeniably the most powerful nation on Earth. Europe was struggling to recover from the devastating effects of the war. The only nation that could rival the US was Stalin’s Soviet Union.

     At this time we were the most scientifically advanced nation on the planet. We were, for a number of years following WWII, the only nation in possession of an atomic weapon. Russia struggled to find the solution and would have been delayed, it is estimated, by four years had the secret not been sold to them.

     This is not the only place we excelled. We were also, perhaps not surprisingly, ranked number one in particle physics during this time. The proof of this rests on the periodic table of elements and you will see down the bottom, Californium, Berkelium, and Americium. They were named for these places because we discovered them first and had the naming rights.

     What all of this is leading up to is that during this same period our education system was producing the best and brightest minds in the world. Let us not forget that the children who were educated in the classrooms of the era immediately post WWII were the same students who would, twenty-four years later, be part of the phenomenon of putting a man on the moon. During the period following WWII America also succeeded in the Cold War and halted the spread of Communism.

     America was at the peak of her prowess. We were far ahead of the other nations. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union it seems that America has lost the drive it once had. The country became complacent and lazy. I submit the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva as evidence. There were plans to build an even bigger one in Texas back in 1993. Congress voted it down, citing budget issues. Our enthusiasm for science, it seems, died with the USSR.

     After such a long-winded explanation I’ll cut to the chase and connect this to education. In that time Europe has redoubled its efforts to catch up having fully recovered from the war. In modern times America is still flying on autopilot while Europe has competent people in the driver’s seat making progressive changes to their education system. They have surged ahead and we have dropped sharply, last I knew we ranked an abysmal twenty-third in the education rankings.

     Much of the problem is that we’re still debating whether or not to switch over to the common core, the benefits of standardized testing, whether or not to teach Intelligent Design “theory” alongside Evolution in science classrooms. We are not pushing a respect for a scientific examination of the facts.  Instead we’re making allowances for utterly nonsensical opinions under the guise of tolerance. Examples of which include revisionist history, climate change deniers, and the insertion of religion into classrooms. These debates are senseless, yet we’re still having them.

     School is where facts are taught. Opinions like those of climate change deniers and religious fundamentalists are dangerous and are fully deserving of refutation and ridicule given that there is no evidence to support anything they have to say. That’s not being intolerant; it’s being rational. People cannot have their own facts. If they want their own “facts” then they go to the internet, as long as they do not try to impress their warped views on children.

     Attention should be given to the education problems mentioned above. Europe has not only resolved them, but has put them into practice with excellent results so far. They are leaving standardized testing behind which opens new paths for teachers to take a much more creative and active role in planning their curriculum and how to best teach their students.  If we want to fix our education system it’s time to admit that we let ourselves slip a bit, bite the bullet and reform education to match European standards. Once we’re on level footing we can adjust as we see fit, but until we've gained equality we have no right, nay we cannot afford, to dodder around.

     To fall even farther behind would be unacceptable. There are reforms being considered, but the incessant debate on what is the best way to approach this are stonewalling progress. This is the heart of my point. The debates over problems that have been solved are not necessary. We already have a perfectly good model for education reform all that we need is someone, just one person, who can get something done about it.  

Thursday, September 11, 2014

My experience with technology in the classroom

Growing up in the late 1990s and early 2000s I can recall times when the teacher rolling out the over-head projector was utilizing the technology of the time. As I progressed through school my experience with teachers who used technology only increased. Of course, there was the obvious use of technology via the internet, but there was not really anyone who understood how it worked. We were allowed on the computers aside from learning how to type as early as the fourth or fifth grade. I experienced no great difficulty in adapting to finding things and searching the internet.

Moving into middle school I struggled greatly with the basic technology classes that taught us how to operate the Microsoft platforms such as Word and PowerPoint. It was the only class in which I ever received D grade. Everything in that class hinged on the final exam and, as usual, when backed into a corner I performed.

High school didn't particularly improve any. I was able to make more than adequate use of Word and PowerPoint to earn good grades. Teachers didn't use technology much. There were laptops that each department has access to. They were stored in bulky metal cabinets that took up the entire hallway when they had to be moved to a classroom. The school was so proud of what they thought was being on the edge of technology.

Around that same time they added Wi-Fi to the school which allowed the laptops internet access. My senior year I found out an interesting fact though, the school was running its Wi-Fi connection on a home setting instead of the business one. What this amounts to is that the school had been trying to run the laptop carts, of which there were five, the computers for the technology classes, the computer lab in the library, and the individual computers in classrooms, on a Wi-Fi signal that was meant to be used only in a home setting. I gawked at the pure stupidity and ignorance of that decision. I have patience for many things, but blatant incompetence isn't one of them. My chemistry teacher was particularly vocal about how the school handled technology. He talked frequently about how the school pushed the teachers to implement technology in the classroom, but when they tried the technology wouldn't work properly.

That said, all was not bad, but there was no particularly good experience with technology either. There is nothing that is note-worthy in any case. When stuff worked it was all roses, but when it didn't, in chemistry class, lesson plans got temporarily tabled and replaced by, perhaps, more important discussions. The class would discuss how technology could be used to benefit students if only the school were able to approach the subject it in a competent, and logical, manner.


As for what I want for my students, first and foremost I want their feedback. I will be able to get this through in-class conversations, and I will probably also make use of blogging which has the added benefit of encouraging students to write. Technology can be a huge asset in the classroom and what I’d hope for my students the most is that they have the opportunities to use technology that I never had as a student. 

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Heading into EDU235: Learning with Technology

     My journey to SNHU wasn’t much of a decision, or journey at all. It was what made the most sense for me at the time. I had spent two years at another school as a psychology major, earned my associate’s degree, and then became disillusioned with my career path. I knew psych wasn't what I wanted to do. I wanted to teach, teach what exactly, well, that was the question. I am capable of teaching pretty much anything, but I have my found my preference is to teach English. I came to SNHU because my former college didn't offer English as a major of choice. If they had I probably would have stayed there and never set foot on a SNHU campus.
     I took my first semester of classes, met some interesting, and not so interesting, people, completed the course work, learned lots of new things, just exceeding my own expectations at basically everything. Somewhere along the way I added a minor in education to my English major. Then when it came time for me to choose my classes that process went much more smoothly than I imagined. The process was unlike anything I had experienced before so I was, naturally, anxious.
     In the end, I landed in the class: Learning with Technology because despite growing up and attending school in the late 1990s and the early 2000s technology has come such a long way. I remember when the over-head projector was a popular piece of technology. Now kids probably come armed to learn with an IPad among other technological tools that have developed in corners of the world-wide-web. Teachers are now granted access to powerful resources that I am, as of yet, mostly unaware of, but look forward to learning about.